Public examination 2

The administration of this year really stands somewhat to do strange title and the problem of similar brain sharp turn: Why has South Pole no bear? Crocodile meets food to lose tear is why matter? Britain the Second World War why stop weather forecasting? , , , some person feels that is rather strange , does not understand , but some person thinks: Possibility is that proposition person wants to establish , examination is a candidate how to choice , the problem of showing consideration for overall interest. " some candidate difference of psychological quality some, possible one sees nervous ", shrewd candidate should have decisive ability , gives up resolutely the title that is hard to handle in order to, in assigned time, have answered the title that can be done , snatches more minute.

There may be two

One is , such test is very scientific , so says that is because this test paper has also made together abstract, macroscopic title actually besides examining a specific, microscopic problem, this big title, is civil servant can often meet also must will face. Civil servant especially leads cadre , is often very busy. As organization retrench constantly, this kind of condition will be still more universal. Plenty of general affairses at the same time seek to visit , some matters are still very difficult, even momentary to be hard to solve , , , civil servant what to be done? Actually, can complain that problem is handled too many anyhow not , matter does not manage too to manage anyhow can not?

Matter has importance. A excellent civil servant so raises working efficiency for the ability that should have reply burst condition and devises strategies within a command tent. Modern government is service type government. A acceptable civil servant should make great effort to make service , and can not complain of the matter of citizen too many in limited time , is too difficult. Do not blame proposition person, because " the occupation of civil servant " need the quality of this respect.

2 is , blame problem if saying to investigate the potential quality of candidate: Should grab to be easy to put disaster, raising scores "efficiency" D D shines this logic, if a official is also so in realistic administration, meet contradiction to skirt go , it does not be thought deeply that meeting difficult problem put , for pursuit, is "efficiency" evasive contradictory, such civil servant a competent civil servant?